A publication of the Indiana Business Research Center at IU's Kelley School of Business
Share | |

Central Indiana: Realtors Region 4 Profile

Figure 1: Central Indiana: Realtors Region 4

Figure 1: Central Indiana: Realtors Region 4

Source: IBRC, using the Indiana Association of Realtors definitions

This is the fourth article in our coverage of Indiana's Realtors regions. Housing is an important dimension of economic and community development in our state, so we are forging a partnership with the Indiana Association of Realtors to encourage understanding of the housing situation in Indiana. For an overview of this article series and a map of all six regions, see the first article at www.incontext.indiana.edu/2010/may-june/article5.asp.

Geographic Context

Realtors Region 4 consists of 10 counties smack dab in the center of the state in what is either called Central Indiana or the Indianapolis area.

With an estimated population of 1.7 million, it is the largest of all six regions. Counties in this region include Boone, Brown, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, Johnson, Marion, Montgomery, Morgan and Shelby (see Figure 1). This region covers a land area of nearly 3,890 square miles and has a population density of nearly 450 people per square mile (that’s quite dense considering the rather roomy state average of 179 people per square mile).

Population

Indianapolis is the largest city in Realtors Region 4 as well as in the state with a 2009 population estimate of 807,584. Fishers (71,052) and Carmel (69,547) come in as a distant second and third largest in the region (see Table 1).

Table 1: Largest Cities in Region 4, 2009

Name Population in 2009 % of Region
Indianapolis 807,584 46.3%
Fishers 71,052 4.1%
Carmel 69,547 4.0%
Greenwood 48,320 2.8%
Lawrence 44,107 2.5%
Noblesville 42,935 2.5%
Plainfield 28,527 1.6%
Franklin 23,595 1.4%
Westfield 22,402 1.3%
Brownsburg 20,644 1.2%

Source: IBRC, using U.S. Census Bureau data

The population in Realtors Region 4 increased between Census 2000 and the latest estimate in 2009 by more than 200,000 people, for a solid 14.3 percent change so far this decade (see Figure 2). The population in Realtors Region 4 is projected to continue its growth through 2015, by which time its population would be close to 1.9 million according to the official county population projections from the Indiana Business Research Center.

Figure 2: Region 4 Population Levels, 1981 to 2009

Figure 2: Region 4 Population Levels, 1981 to 2009

Source: IBRC, using U.S. Census Bureau data

This region has an age mix that differs from the state mix (see Figure 3). Realtors Region 4 has a higher proportion of young adults, preschoolers and school age children than the state overall.

Figure 3: Current Age Structure, 2009

Figure 3: Current Age Structure, 2009

Source: IBRC, using U.S. Census Bureau data

Among the six Realtors regions, Region 4 ranks first in net migration from other nations, with 2,851 more people moving into the region from overseas or across borders between 2008 and 2009 than moving out. The region had a domestic net increase of 7,314 people—that is, in-migration to this region outpaced out-migration by a considerable number.

About 82 percent of the population is white, making this the least homogenous region among the six. Fifteen percent of the population is black (compared to the state’s 9.1 percent), and a little over 5 percent of the region’s population is Hispanic (which is somewhat smaller than the statewide 5.5 percent estimated for 2009).

Housing and Life Styles

The region ranks first among the six regions with 760,596 housing units (2009 estimate). The majority of units (62.3 percent) were owner-occupied, according to Census 2000, although the region has a significant share of the state’s rental housing. More than half of households in the region were married couples (23.8 percent with children, 27.1 percent without), 10 percent were single-parent households, and 27 percent lived alone.

Home sales in the region, not surprisingly, have slowed along with the rest of the state and the nation. Regardless, the region accounted for 36 percent of all homes sold in the state in 2009, compared to 35 percent in 2005. The median sale price has shifted downward, from $130,000 in 2005 to $118,000 in 2009, so Region 4 is part of that nationwide buyer’s market.

In 2009, nearly 23,300 homes were sold in the central region, with a median age of 17 years (that is, median year built was 1992). That median age was definitely younger when compared to the state, with a median build-year of 1976 (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: Percent of Homes Sold in 2009 by Year Built

Figure 4: Percent of Homes Sold in 2009 by Year Built

Source: IBRC, using Indiana Association of Realtors data

Looking at individual counties in the region, there is a significant spread based on the median age of homes sold in 2009 (see Figure 5).

Figure 5: Median Age of Homes Sold in 2009 by County in Realtors Region 4

Figure 5: Median Age of Homes Sold in 2009 by County in Realtors Region 4

Source: IBRC, using Indiana Association of Realtors data

The vast majority of homes sold were priced under $200,000 and about 50 homes were sold for $1 million or more in 2009. Using a statewide comparison, the region’s home sales occurred at a higher frequency in the ranges above $100,000 (see Figure 6).

Figure 6: Cost of Homes Sold Compared to the State, 2009

Figure 6: Cost of Homes Sold Compared to the State, 2009

Source: IBRC, using Indiana Association of Realtors data

Labor Force

As seen in Figure 7, nearly 900,000 residents of the region are part of the labor force, with 820,000 people employed and the remaining 75,000 actively seeking work (i.e., unemployed), based on 2009 annual average). The September 2010 unemployment rate for the region was 8.7 percent, lower than the state rate of 9.5 percent for that same month (figures are not seasonally adjusted). For a closer inspection of labor force numbers, be sure to visit Hoosiers by the Numbers at www.hoosierdata.in.gov, the workforce development website of the Indiana Department of Workforce Development. These numbers are released monthly as preliminary estimates and previous months’ figures are revised.

Figure 7: Realtors Region 4 Resident Labor Force and Employment, 1990 to 2009

Figure 7: Realtor Region 4 Resident Labor Force and Employment, 1990 to 2009

Note: Data are not seasonally adjusted.
Source: IBRC, using Indiana Department of Workforce Development data

Work

The vast majority of residents work in private industry. The largest sectors in the region include health care and social services, retail trade, and manufacturing (see Table 2).

Table 2: Realtors Region 4 Jobs by Industry, 2009

Industry Jobs Jobs LQ
Total 830,118 1.00
Health Care and Social Services 101,337 0.64
Retail Trade 88,938 0.75
Manufacturing 87,302 1.14
Accommodation and Food Services 71,208 0.85
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services 58,871 1.09
Transportation and Warehousing 49,722 1.45
Public Administration 42,619 0.88
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 41,462 0.51
Finance and Insurance 40,796 0.68
Construction 38,533 0.99
Wholesale Trade 38,359 0.84
Other Services (Except Public Administration) 26,510 0.80
Information 15,926 0.71
Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 14,259 0.91
Educational Services 13,638 0.16
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation 12,111 0.60
Management of Companies and Enterprises 10,875 0.91
Utilities 3,976 0.75
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting 1,160 0.16
Mining 641 0.16
Unallocated 33 0.03

Source: IBRC, using U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data

Jobs within Industry Cluster

Clusters can be a valuable way to organize our thinking about industry mix in an area. The Purdue Center for Regional Development has identified 17 industry clusters that give insight into the core industries and their supplier industries. The resulting data can help the region consider which are important or emerging clusters (see Table 3).

Table 3: Realtors Region 4 Industry Clusters, 2008

Description Cluster Employment Industry Cluster Employment LQ
Total All Industries 870,084 1.00
Business and Financial Services 78,309 1.03
Transportation and Logistics 43,227 1.69
Biomedical/Biotechnical (Life Sciences) 42,257 1.41
Manufacturing Supercluster 42,246 1.01
Defense and Security 36,039 0.84
Energy (Fossil and Renewable) 35,315 0.68
Information Technology and Telecommunications 28,657 0.70
Chemicals and Chemical Based Products 23,342 1.60
Arts, Entertainment, Recreation and Vistor Industries 21,095 0.61
Advanced Materials 16,596 0.49
Printing and Publishing 16,513 0.99
Education and Knowledge Creation 15,709 0.19
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing* 15,431 1.46
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing* 12,560 1.27
Forest and Wood Products 11,089 0.69
Agribusiness, Food Processing and Technology 9,055 0.44
Machinery Manufacturing* 7,918 1.04
Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing* 4,256 0.53
Apparel and Textiles 4,042 0.55
Glass and Ceramics 2,936 0.85
Primary Metal Manufacturing* 1,296 0.45
Electrical Equipment, Appliance and Component Manufacturing* 785 0.29
Mining 651 0.49

*These are subclusters within the manufacturing supercluster.
Source: IBRC, using U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics and Purdue Center for Regional Development data

In using the table, it’s worthwhile to consider the actual employment numbers shown. It’s almost always good to consider “how many” jobs comprise a particular cluster. Another valuable measure is the location quotient (LQ) provided in the column next to the employment numbers. Anything over 1.0 means the region has what is considered export capacity—exporting to neighbors in another region, another state, across the nation or around the globe. The idea of producing “more than we need” indicates that those clusters are serving needs outside the region as well as within its borders. In short, having an LQ higher than 1.0 is good; if it is a lot higher, then the cluster can be considered substantial, and is at least worth a closer look as part of an economic development strategy.

If clusters have piqued your interest, be sure to turn your browser to www.statsamerica.org/innovation to see these data in action for areas throughout Indiana and in comparison to the rest of the country.

Time to Explore

We hope to have given you a fast trek through the numbers. We could go on, but then that might spoil your fun in going to STATS Indiana’s IN Depth Profiles and learning more about this region or the whole host of regions we have available.

Carol O. Rogers
Deputy Director, Indiana Business Research Center, Indiana University Kelley School of Business